Webmaster Key - Discussion Forums


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 09, 2012, 04:54:53 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Welceome to Forums!

Important information for guests and new members:

In order to understand the full benefits of becoming an active member of this forum, please review the following information on guest and new member restrictions. These forum changes have been prompted by an overwhelming and unreasonable amount of bot postings and incoherent guest spam messages. We wish to prevent these events from happening in the future and make our community a more comfortable place for all of our members.

For guests:

Guests are not allowed to open new topics, polls, or posts attachments.
If you wish to open up new discussions on this forum, we encourage you to register.

For new members:

New members with less than five posts are not allowed to modify additional profile information such as avatars, contact information, biographies, and signatures. However, new members are encouraged to post their own topics or reply to topics initiated by other members. Become active on the forums and 5 posts should be an easy task!

We are a diverse community with members from all over the world. We encourage new ideas and interesting conversation. Do not be afraid to post webmaster/computer-related questions or problems, as our active members are always willing to help when they are able. Interested? Join us.

+ Webmaster Key Forums
|-+ Website Marketing
| |-+ Search Engines and Directories
| | |-+ Search Engine News and Articles (Moderator: Andy)
| | | |-+ Should Google Include Social Bookmarking Sites?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Stumble Upon! Digg It! del.icio.us! Add to Technorati! ReddIt!  Send this topic Print
Author Topic: Should Google Include Social Bookmarking Sites?  (Read 2839 times)
Ajax
Limited Member

Posts: 3



« on: January 08, 2007, 03:46:50 PM »

Search Engine Journal recently wrote an article quoting pieces of a debate that's sprung up about digg (and more generically, the social bookmarking sites) being included in google's index.

Here are the arguments:

Allen Stern:

Quote:
My belief is that this is not enough to warrant a listing in Google. Since at its most basic sense Digg only offers a link to the actual story, then that story should occupy that position within Google, not the Digg link. I believe content publishers actually lose the chance to see that visitor because the person has to click twice and even understand that they must do that. And I am talking about mainstream non-diggers now, not the group who already understands what Digg is for. 

William Burn:

Quote:
Digg.com is acting as a gateway to the great content which would (usually) have been lost in Google’s monolithic index, never to be found or stumbled upon by searchers. Additionally, as a counter to his “the person has to click twice and even understand that they must do that” statement, the Digg.com interface is very easy to use, it’s almost an exact clone of a Google result (a big blue link/title with description underneath) so the user will already be familiar with it, as a result the user would not be confused by it and will find their way to the content they were looking for; that’s if the content still appeals to them after reading the accompanying description. 

Personally, I am a bit conflicted on this issue. Digg obviously has the ability to provide extra search engine exposure for content. If said content is on a site that doesn't rank well in the SE's then the Digg listing can help guide traffic to the content.

However, as Allen said, Digg is just listing a sentence or two of the content. That's not nearly enough and really that listing shouldn't come before the actual content that Digg is pointing to. So, IMO google and the other SE's should figure out a way to rank the original content before Digg's listing, perhaps with the Digg listing (and the subsequent discussion on the topic) as a sub-listing. This could be done for any and all of the major social bookmarking sites that link to that specific story.

What do you think?
Report to moderator   Logged

Menard
Key Keeper
Veteran
*****
Posts: 965



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2007, 04:25:24 PM »

Cool! Grin

Is there a script available to automate one of these sites? I want one.
Report to moderator   Logged

Andy
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 5 752



« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2007, 02:55:28 PM »

My opinion is that social bookmarking site links like from digg must be included in search engine ranking scores since they are votes for a site by the readers. Human's are more clever than machines in evaluating website content so always favour the majority human vote IMHO

The effect would however be transient where the votes are transient too i.e. spike up for a day or two.
Report to moderator   Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Stumble Upon! Digg It! del.icio.us! Add to Technorati! ReddIt!  Send this topic Print 
+ Webmaster Key Forums
|-+ Website Marketing
| |-+ Search Engines and Directories
| | |-+ Search Engine News and Articles (Moderator: Andy)
| | | |-+ Should Google Include Social Bookmarking Sites?

Jump to:  
« previous next »


Our Partners
RelmaxTOP Ranking System Web Hosting RelmaxTOP Ranking System
Staff Sites
12Noon[12Noon Gallery] Andy[Urgentclick]
Tamuril[Tamuril's Digital Art Exhibit] Sensovision
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP We are hosted by Relmax Inc. |Our Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Forum design by Tamuril © 2005.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!