Webmaster Key - Discussion Forums


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 07, 2012, 10:13:38 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Welceome to Forums!

Important information for guests and new members:

In order to understand the full benefits of becoming an active member of this forum, please review the following information on guest and new member restrictions. These forum changes have been prompted by an overwhelming and unreasonable amount of bot postings and incoherent guest spam messages. We wish to prevent these events from happening in the future and make our community a more comfortable place for all of our members.

For guests:

Guests are not allowed to open new topics, polls, or posts attachments.
If you wish to open up new discussions on this forum, we encourage you to register.

For new members:

New members with less than five posts are not allowed to modify additional profile information such as avatars, contact information, biographies, and signatures. However, new members are encouraged to post their own topics or reply to topics initiated by other members. Become active on the forums and 5 posts should be an easy task!

We are a diverse community with members from all over the world. We encourage new ideas and interesting conversation. Do not be afraid to post webmaster/computer-related questions or problems, as our active members are always willing to help when they are able. Interested? Join us.

+ Webmaster Key Forums
|-+ General Discussion
| |-+ Cut Loose Saloon
| | |-+ Mars mission by Bush vs Mars Mission by Russia
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2  All Go Down Stumble Upon! Digg It! del.icio.us! Add to Technorati! ReddIt!  Send this topic Print
Author Topic: Mars mission by Bush vs Mars Mission by Russia  (Read 5411 times)
SensoVision
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 5 857


I'm proud user of Debian GNU/Linux OS


WWW
« on: January 15, 2004, 01:30:29 AM »

Today I've heard in news statement of Bush who promised to launch mission to Mars and was a bit impressed since I wait for this thing to happen long time ago and thought that NASA already planning something but didn't reveal their plans as for now, while I start to look for resources about USA mission to Mars I've spot strange heading which tells that Russia also plan to launch manned ship in 2014 and with much lesser cost only $15 billions in comparing to $150 billions by USA Shocked Don't sure if they succeed although. Anyway if you interested check out this link.
BTW what do you think about this all, will some of this missions become truth in the dates which was named?
Report to moderator   Logged

Denis
12noon
Key Master
Veteran
*****
Posts: 1 321



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2004, 02:09:31 AM »

As far as i know it takes six months to get to Mars. Thats a long time and what with all the robot space craft that have tried to go to Mars and not survived. I'm not sure.
 Shocked
I would love to see a man or men or even woman on Mars, but i'm not sure if we have the ability to do it just yet.
Lets hope who ever does go will be safe anyway.
Report to moderator   Logged

SensoVision
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 5 857


I'm proud user of Debian GNU/Linux OS


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2004, 02:37:16 AM »

yeah, you right on this. hopefully techonology become more advanced till 2014 and people would be safe. BTW from what I understand NASA plan to land on the planet, Russians just be on the Mars's orbit and let robots land to surface and explore it... so it should be a bit safer probably... on the other hand if USA will invest so much they could get more safety measures probably...
BTW on BBC was said that Europe also prepearing similar mission to 2030, anyone have more info about this?
Report to moderator   Logged

Denis
Queen Bee
Mother of All
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 2 624


Buzz, buzz!


WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2004, 03:28:04 AM »

Quote
only $15 billions in comparing to $150 billions by USA
That sounds about right... the American government loves spending more on less and less on more.

As far as whether they will ever succeed in this mission... So many things have happened, things that seemed impossible at the time-- I don't know.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jeanne
Key Keeper
Full Member
***
Posts: 138



« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2004, 11:33:46 PM »

I really dont see any sense in this. Huh
It would make for sense to take this money for anything which could people the people on earth and to save the earth and not to produce more space trash..
I dont really know what people want to find at at Mars.
I think we have allready enough problems and Bush only want to take the attation from real problems with this bla bla.
Report to moderator   Logged

Don't forget!!!I have sawdusts in my head. Long words just make me upset!
12noon
Key Master
Veteran
*****
Posts: 1 321



WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2004, 02:46:50 AM »

If the money wasn't going to be spent on trying to get to Mars. Then it would be nice to think that the money would go to helping the less fortunate people of the Earth, but i don't think this money would be available to be spent on anything else other than the space program.
I'm sure if you asked president bush to give the money to some other project, he would tell you how much we need to explore space and that other funds are set aside for other projects.
Report to moderator   Logged

Queen Bee
Mother of All
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 2 624


Buzz, buzz!


WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2004, 03:19:18 AM »

Quote
but i don't think this money would be available to be spent on anything else other than the space program.
Yes, and it seems to me that America's priorities need to be readjusted... make the money available for other projects.

Quote
I'm sure if you asked president bush to give the money to some other project, he would tell you how much we need to explore space and that other funds are set aside for other projects.
Apparently Bush seems to think that money set aside for the EPA is readily available for use with his campaign ads (Read about it here) so why not use the space funds elsewhere?

Not to get sidetracked here, I know this topic is about the space mission... FTR I'm not trying to start an argument, just voice my opinions.  Wink
« Last Edit: January 16, 2004, 04:16:56 AM by articutis » Report to moderator   Logged

Allin1Joe
Key Keeper
Full Member
***
Posts: 161


« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2004, 11:18:03 PM »

Space exploration is a must.  There is only so many resources, and so much space on this planet.  We need to expand if we plan to survive.

As for the differing price tag, the US plans to build an entire new fleet of ships to replace the shuttles AND build a permanent station on the moon too.  If done right, they can build everything they need for the Mars mission in space.
Report to moderator   Logged

Joe
Queen Bee
Mother of All
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 2 624


Buzz, buzz!


WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2004, 11:30:10 PM »

Quote
There is only so many resources, and so much space on this planet.  We need to expand if we plan to survive.
I think we need to take care of what we have if we plan to survive. What are we running out of here that we plan on finding somewhere else? This is not a rhetorical question, I would like to know.
Report to moderator   Logged

12noon
Key Master
Veteran
*****
Posts: 1 321



WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2004, 12:49:28 AM »

I think we need to take care of what we have if we plan to survive. What are we running out of here that we plan on finding somewhere else? This is not a rhetorical question, I would like to know.

I'll have a guess that we are running out of space. The worlds population is running out of control and more people are alive today than at any other point in history.
Finding ways to live on other planets will or might solve our over population problems of the future.
Report to moderator   Logged

Queen Bee
Mother of All
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 2 624


Buzz, buzz!


WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2004, 04:14:57 AM »

Overpopulation is really a subjective standard... I could sit here and argue about it all day, and would still come to the same conclusion.

Quote
Finding ways to live on other planets will or might solve our over population problems of the future.
Maybe we could let the Russians go up there and find out, while we're busy trying to take care of what's still on Earth with us (There are too many poor, uneducated, and/or sick people running around in America to consume ourselves with this right now).

Bush is an idiot when it comes to economy.

I suppose it's pointless to babble on like this, especially seeing I have absolutely no say-so about what's going on up there.
Report to moderator   Logged

spherica
Key Keeper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 277


Consultant


WWW
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2004, 12:56:07 PM »

Well I don't know much about Mission to Mars, but I truely did like the movie "The Red Planet" (not that this anything to do with this topic)

I also think space exploration is a must, lets face it its not just the over population, although that is a growing concern. Its also about natural resources, I know there are people that are trying to find alternative means. ie Wind Generators, Solar Panels, ect.

But we are always going to need other resources.
Report to moderator   Logged

Queen Bee
Mother of All
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 2 624


Buzz, buzz!


WWW
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2004, 08:37:37 AM »

Hmm... I could sit here and argue against the points made for the next several weeks (I even have book references), but it would get me no where-- We're obviously going to space whether I like it or not.

For the moment I will pretend that we really, really need to go to space right now-- The world is practically decaying around us (According to several users on this forum, as well as many other people on the web). So why is it that only North America and Russia care? Don't you think it would be in the best interest of the other countries to fund these missions, if it is this incredibly important?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2004, 08:43:08 AM by Retro-Teknix » Report to moderator   Logged

spherica
Key Keeper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 277


Consultant


WWW
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2004, 11:05:45 AM »

Yes you possibly could argue, maybe I used the wrong words there.

As for about other countries, I really don't have much of a comment on this. I might jokingly say, do you really think the Taliban will back this   Roll Eyes
Report to moderator   Logged

Queen Bee
Mother of All
Administrator
Veteran
*****
Posts: 2 624


Buzz, buzz!


WWW
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2004, 07:36:05 AM »

Quote
I might jokingly say, do you really think the Taliban will back this
Hahaha... Cheesy

I'm sure it seems like I have some sort of peeve with space missions... But that's not it-- I just really feel like there are more important things America should be focusing on, that's all.
Report to moderator   Logged

Pages: [1] 2  All Go Up Stumble Upon! Digg It! del.icio.us! Add to Technorati! ReddIt!  Send this topic Print 
+ Webmaster Key Forums
|-+ General Discussion
| |-+ Cut Loose Saloon
| | |-+ Mars mission by Bush vs Mars Mission by Russia

Jump to:  
« previous next »


Our Partners
RelmaxTOP Ranking System Web Hosting RelmaxTOP Ranking System
Staff Sites
12Noon[12Noon Gallery] Andy[Urgentclick]
Tamuril[Tamuril's Digital Art Exhibit] Sensovision
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP We are hosted by Relmax Inc. |Our Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Forum design by Tamuril © 2005.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!